Here’s a recap of sweet and not-so-sweet e-mail campaigns I received last week.
[Sweet E-mails]
Although no e-mail campaign is truly perfect (even if it was perfect, all the rules will change in about….a minute), these are STAND OUT message (for one reason or another). As always, I welcome comments and suggestions regarding stellar campaigns worth checking out.

Fab.com Announces Partnership with Fast Company on Sept 14, 2011
+ great layout. seriously. don’t you want to click on a few links? i bet you clicked on the image.
+ optimized for images off (aside from the annoying “booth” alt tag).
+ good use of “bolding” with font color = clear hierarchy of content.
+ MOST alt tags are used well.
- red font might not be a good idea. it didn’t get spammed, but it could have…
- no value statement above the fold. well, sorta WAY at the bottom.

Jamaica Plain Patch Newsletter on September 14, 2011
+ aside from silly alt tags at the top (“View as Webpage”), you wouldn’t even notice images are off.
+ good use of “bolding” with font color = clear hierarchy of content and easy to read.
- if there’s going to be a deal near the top, may as well make it the pre-header.

Babeland (yes! as in sex toys….) Newsletter on September 14, 2011
+ for a three column (potentially cluttered) e-mail, pretty good layout. still easy to read.
+ optimized for images off (which must be hard to do when marketing sex toys!).
+ clear message (i REALLY want to know what the njoy is….)
+ MOST alt tags are used well.
- no value statement above the fold, but might not be necessary for this e-mail…

Kayak Newsletter on September 14, 2011
+ layout + image optimization + use of alt tags = rocks!!
+ great use of font sizing without getting TOO spammy.
+ clear top navigation for the “browsing” customer.
+ each message is short, sweet and appealing.
- vast white space at top + no pre-header.

SEOmoz Newsletter on September 14, 2011
+ decent pre-header with appealing value statement (for those in niche field).
+ use of numbers as bullets to organize key content.
+ high text to image ratio.
- use of white font over colored background.

Compendium Newsletter on September 15, 2011
+ layout + “bolding” = fairly easy to scan.
+ compelling subject lines and CTAs (for people in the industry).
- could optimize pre-header and eliminate background color for improved deliverability…

Vitalicious Campaign on September 15, 2011
+ give the vast amount of white space and images, good use of alt tag with offer statement.
+ inclusion of text bumps up the text to image ratio.
- too image heavy… do the pictures really SELL the muffins in the e-mails themselves?

Idealist Job Fair Reminder on September 16, 2011
+ these letter style newsletters have been very effective for me in the past.
+ high text to image ratio.
- not easy to scan (but easy to read without images…).

Ticketmaster Newsletter on September 16, 2011
+ calendar visual = stellar!
+ great layout that is easy to scan and digest.
+ personalization with “my favorites” is a nice touch.
- heavy use of background color and what looks like a lot of embedded tables (tables w/in tables).
- white font looks spammy and will not show in some inboxes.
[E-mail Fail]
More often than not, I see e-mail campaigns that fail to deliver value and/or a message of any kind. What a missed opportunity! Here’s YOUR opportunity (and mine) to learn from the past. If you disagree (or wholeheartedly share my opinion), I’d love to hear your feedback.
P.S. I block sender names and domains with boxes to protect “the innocent”. This is not a commentary on brands or companies. I often receive stellar campaigns and epic failures from the same source.

Subject: Tweed Time / Date: September 14, 2011
- without displaying images, this message is absolutely meaningless to me.
- DO NOT rely solely on the power of your brand. so much missed opportunity.

Subject: Offer Statement + ROCK OF AGES / Date: September 14, 2011
- my eyes hurt!!!
- no meaningful pre-header and WAY too image heavy.
+ offer statement as alt tag (since this is SO image heavy) IF you could actually read it.
+ subject line may be the saving grace of this message.

Subject: Sparkle this September with… / Date: September 14, 2011
- oh my useless alt tags.
- no meaningful pre-header and WAY too image heavy.

Subject: Get set to go Dalmatian-… / Date: September 15, 2011
- this subject line makes no sense to me. maybe i’m not the target demo…?
- oh my useless alt tags.
- no meaningful pre-header and WAY too image heavy.

Subject: BOS: A Jazzy Speakeasy… / Date: September 15, 2011
- WHY is this e-mail 1200px wide? anyone?
- black background = super harsh on eyes and spammy.
- white font over black background will not display in a lot of inboxes.
+ “women want you. bakers fear you.” sweeeeeet.

Subject: Free Shipping Today Only / Date: September 15, 2011
- without images, there’s NOT message aside from the offer statement in the subject
- no pre-header.
- background color give to images = looks more like spam.

Subject: Upcoming Events with… / Date: September 15, 2011
- IF your e-mail MUST be this image heavy, i suggest alt tags.
- only image optimization is for the footer, which seems to have no real value.
- vanity “from” e-mail domain = soooo easy to setup.
- no pre-header.
+ social media links included (when images display).
+ the footer DOES look nice.